Blog Post

Types of Negligence in a Personal Injury Claim

Feb 06, 2024

Accurately filing an injury claim is crucial for victims to recover fully. Most personal injury claims involve negligence, so consulting a lawyer can help determine fault and obtain a fair settlement. Here's a closer look at the types of negligence in personal injury claims.


Gross Negligence


Gross negligence in personal injury claims refers to the severe and reckless disregard for the safety and well-being of others, resulting in significant harm or injury. Gross negligence occurs when an individual or entity demonstrates a blatant failure to exercise reasonable care or caution far beyond what any prudent person would deem acceptable in similar circumstances.


When someone engages in gross negligence, they act with a wanton indifference to the potential harm they may cause to others. The potential harm goes beyond simple negligence, which involves failing to meet the standard duty of care, as gross negligence demonstrates recklessness and conscious indifference to the consequences of their actions.


Victims of gross negligence may suffer from severe physical injuries, emotional trauma, and significant financial burdens due to medical expenses and lost wages. You should gather substantial evidence demonstrating the defendant's willful and reckless conduct to establish a gross negligence claim. This evidence may include eyewitness accounts, expert testimonies, video footage, or documented violations of safety regulations.


Contributory Negligence


Contributory negligence in personal injury claims is a legal concept that allocates responsibility for an accident or injury between the parties involved. Contributory negligence is based on the principle that if the injured party's actions contributed to the incident or worsened the damages suffered, their compensation may be reduced or denied accordingly.


The plaintiff's contributory negligence, if proven, does not automatically bar their claim, but it can affect the final award. Some jurisdictions follow a "pure" contributory negligence rule, where even a slight contribution by the plaintiff towards the injury can prevent recovery. However, other jurisdictions apply a "comparative negligence" approach, which reduces the damages proportionally to the plaintiff's degree of fault.


Comparative Negligence


Comparative negligence is a legal principle applied in personal injury claims to determine the degree of fault of each party involved in an accident or incident resulting in harm or injury. 


In a comparative negligence system, the court assesses the actions of the plaintiff (the injured party) and the defendant (the alleged at-fault party) to establish the percentage of fault assigned to each. For instance, the court examines factors like speeding, disregarding traffic signals, or failing to yield the right-of-way in a car accident.


Once the percentage of fault is determined, the compensation awarded to the plaintiff is adjusted accordingly. For instance, if the plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault and the defendant 80% at fault, their compensation will be reduced by 20% to account for their contribution to the accident.


Vicarious Negligence


Vicarious negligence is a concept in personal injury claims where one party is held legally responsible for the negligent actions of another individual. In such cases, the liable party, often an employer or principal, is deemed accountable for the negligent conduct of their employee or agent, even if they were not directly involved in causing the injury.


To establish vicarious negligence, the plaintiff has to demonstrate that the wrongdoer was acting within the scope of their duties or responsibilities at the time of the incident.


This doctrine is founded on the idea that employers or principals, who benefit from their employees' or agents' services or actions, should bear the burden of ensuring their agents act with due care. The injured party must demonstrate that the wrongful act occurred within the context of the agent's role and that the employer or principal had control or the right to control the agent's actions.


Borbi, Clancy & Patrizi, LLC, South Jersey personal injury lawyers, dedicate themselves to safeguarding the rights of injured individuals. Our well-established reputation stems from providing top-notch legal services, and we focus solely on personal injury and workers' compensation cases to ensure effective and professional handling of claims. Contact us to schedule an appointment.

Share by: